Formatting was clean through53288116and then drifted across three commits on 2026-07-30:1bf7aac7left one source unformatted,f13f5af6a second, anddaab4f1efour more. CI's Verify formatting job checks the whole tree, so it has had six files to report ever since. No pre-commit hook is installed in this checkout, so the aggregate check never ran locally to catch them. Formatted with the dart_style revision Dart 3.12.0 bundles, which is what the pinned Flutter 3.44.0 CI toolchain runs, rather than with a newer local SDK; the two disagree about some argument-list splits. The current stable formatter accepts this result as well, so both report the tree clean.
95 lines
3.3 KiB
Dart
95 lines
3.3 KiB
Dart
import 'dart:async';
|
|
|
|
import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
|
|
import 'package:plezy/services/device_performance.dart';
|
|
|
|
void main() {
|
|
TestWidgetsFlutterBinding.ensureInitialized();
|
|
|
|
setUp(() {
|
|
DevicePerformance.debugReset();
|
|
addTearDown(DevicePerformance.debugReset);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('concurrent callers wait for hardware detection', () async {
|
|
final detection = Completer<void>();
|
|
DevicePerformance.debugDetectionGate = detection.future;
|
|
|
|
final first = DevicePerformance.getInstance(override: VisualEffectsSetting.reduced);
|
|
var secondCompleted = false;
|
|
final second = DevicePerformance.getInstance();
|
|
unawaited(second.then((_) => secondCompleted = true));
|
|
await Future<void>.delayed(Duration.zero);
|
|
|
|
expect(secondCompleted, isFalse);
|
|
detection.complete();
|
|
|
|
final instances = await Future.wait([first, second]);
|
|
expect(identical(instances.first, instances.last), isTrue);
|
|
expect(DevicePerformance.isReduced, isTrue);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('failed hardware detection can be retried', () async {
|
|
DevicePerformance.debugDetectionGate = Future<void>.error(StateError('detection failed'));
|
|
|
|
await expectLater(DevicePerformance.getInstance(), throwsStateError);
|
|
|
|
DevicePerformance.debugDetectionGate = null;
|
|
final recovered = await DevicePerformance.getInstance();
|
|
expect(recovered, isNotNull);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
group('displayBudgetFactor', () {
|
|
void detectAt(double shortestSide) {
|
|
DevicePerformance.debugDisplayShortestSideOverride = shortestSide;
|
|
DevicePerformance.debugDetectDisplayBudget();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test('stays 1.0 until a latch runs', () {
|
|
DevicePerformance.debugReset(autoReduced: false, override: VisualEffectsSetting.auto);
|
|
expect(DevicePerformance.displayBudgetFactor(), 1.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('scales with the display shortest side up to 2x', () {
|
|
DevicePerformance.debugReset(autoReduced: false, override: VisualEffectsSetting.auto);
|
|
|
|
detectAt(1080);
|
|
expect(DevicePerformance.displayBudgetFactor(), 1.0);
|
|
|
|
detectAt(1440);
|
|
expect(DevicePerformance.displayBudgetFactor(), closeTo(1440 / 1080, 0.001));
|
|
|
|
detectAt(2160);
|
|
expect(DevicePerformance.displayBudgetFactor(), 2.0);
|
|
|
|
// 8K stays at the 2x ceiling.
|
|
detectAt(4320);
|
|
expect(DevicePerformance.displayBudgetFactor(), 2.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('sub-1080p displays never shrink the budget below 1.0', () {
|
|
DevicePerformance.debugReset(autoReduced: false, override: VisualEffectsSetting.auto);
|
|
detectAt(720);
|
|
expect(DevicePerformance.displayBudgetFactor(), 1.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('mid-RAM hardware holds a 4K budget at 1.5x', () {
|
|
DevicePerformance.debugReset(autoReduced: false, override: VisualEffectsSetting.auto, totalMemBytes: 2400 << 20);
|
|
detectAt(2160);
|
|
expect(DevicePerformance.displayBudgetFactor(), 1.5);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('high-RAM hardware keeps the full 4K budget', () {
|
|
DevicePerformance.debugReset(autoReduced: false, override: VisualEffectsSetting.auto, totalMemBytes: 2870 << 20);
|
|
detectAt(2160);
|
|
expect(DevicePerformance.displayBudgetFactor(), 2.0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('reduced tier pins the budget to 1.0 even after a 4K latch', () {
|
|
DevicePerformance.debugReset(autoReduced: true, override: VisualEffectsSetting.auto);
|
|
detectAt(2160);
|
|
expect(DevicePerformance.displayBudgetFactor(), 1.0);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
}
|